文法解析:

若非當時台灣銀行界為了競爭消費金融的誘人利潤,幾乎沒有限制的擴張授信額度, 現在也不會有一個月收入不過兩萬六千元的上班族竟然會負債一兩百萬.

過去事實的敘述 => 台灣銀行界沒有限制的擴張授信額度

現在事實的敘述 =>有一個月收入不過兩萬六千元的上班族竟然會負債一兩百萬.

 

A.

1.如果當時台灣銀行界沒有為了競爭消費金融的誘人利潤, 幾乎沒有限制的擴張授信額度  –  zero conditional: Real過去事實的敘述 (過去) => 沒有限制的擴張授信額度,
是事實的敘述, 因此,不用條件 (因為不與事實相反)

 

If the Taiwanese banking industry did not expand credit unlimitedly to compete after the lucrative profits from consumer finance,

 

Or,

If not for the unlimited credit expansion in the Taiwanese banking industry, competing furiously after the lucrative profits from consumer finance in the past,

 

2. 現在不會有一個月收入不過兩萬六千元的上班族竟然負債一兩百萬Second Conditional: Unreal 與現在事實相反的敘述 (用過去式) => 不會有一個月收入不過兩萬六千元的上班族竟然負債一兩百萬.

a white-collar, earning only twenty-six thousand dollars monthly, would not go one to two million dollars in debt now.

 

Or,

 

there would not be a white-collar, earning only twenty-six thousand dollars monthly, actually going one to two million dollars in debt now.

 

B.
1.如果當時台灣銀行界有限制的擴張授信額度, 沒有為了競爭消費金融的誘人利潤Third Conditional: 與過去事實相反的敘述 (用過去完成式)

If the Taiwanese banking industry had limited credit expansion and had not competed after the lucrative profits from consumer finance,

 

Or,

Had the Taiwanese banking industry limited credit expansion and not competed after the lucrative profits from consumer finance,

 

2. 現在不會有一個月收入不過兩萬六千元的上班族竟然會負債一兩百萬
Second Conditional: 與現在事實相反的敘述 (用過去式)
 

there would not be a white-collar, earning only twenty-six thousand dollars monthly, actually going one to two million dollars in debt now.


* 版權所有 - Elisa

 

 

 

 

elisaenglish 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()