公告
"Copyright by Elisa English" ** The views expressed are mine only and do not represent the views of my employer or anyone else. ** 嚴重聲明: Elisa English 文章版權所有 - 請勿竊取. **沒有得到我 (Elisa English) 的許可不可轉貼我的文章及翻譯。請刪除在您的部落格裡我的所有文章及翻譯, 否則我將採取法律行動。 Legal actions will be taken if copyright infringement is found. ** 為阻止有人來鬧場, 我不得不限制誰可以在我部落格留言。 想要留言給我,你首先需要一個pixnet帳戶,如有不當留言,將被列入黑名單. 文章迴響只限好友. 悄悄話留言只能悄悄話答覆, 不過可能會整理後發表非隱私部分, 以供大家學習. 文章將不時校對和更新。如您發現任何用字錯誤或錯別字,請告知. 勿登廣告或求代寫功課. 歡迎中文留言. 但我的答覆一律以英文為主. 盡可能在一至10天內回應, 但可能更久, 因我也有自己的工作,家庭和生活.

目前分類:英文文法 (92)

瀏覽方式: 標題列表 簡短摘要

Compound Words: One Single Word? Two Words? Hyphenated?

 

To hyphenate, or not to hyphenate: that is the question.

elisaenglish 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

Sentence structures:

 

Simple Sentence

elisaenglish 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

What is Parallel Structure?

Parallel structure uses the same pattern of words to show that two or more ideas have the same level of importance as well as to create clear and concise sentences to help the reader quickly process information.  If one element is an adjective, then all elements should be adjectives; if one element is a verb, then all elements should be verbs, and so forth.

 

elisaenglish 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

“As … as I” vs. “as … as me”

“Than I” vs. “than me”

“As well as I” vs. “as well as me”

elisaenglish 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

A correlative conjunction always shows up in pairs, linking sentence elements of the same kind.  Remember parallelism with correlative conjunctions.  Use matching grammatical forms on the words which follow the correlative conjunctions to ensure parallelism.

 

相關連接詞是由兩個或多個字組成的連接詞。相關連接詞兩邊的文法關係必須對稱 - 所連接的部份是同等關係。

elisaenglish 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

Tag Question - Negative Statements with words such as hardly, seldom, nobody, etc.

 

Statements with words that carry negative meaning are considered negative statements and are followed by positive tags.  A tag question is a statement turned into a question, when asking for confirmation or disconfirmation of that statement.

elisaenglish 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

Tag question “shall we” vs. “okay” in the “Let’s” statement

There is a subtle difference between “shall we” and “okay” as a tag question in a “Let’s” statement. 

With the tag “shall we” in the “Let’s” statement, we seem to be making more of a declaration in the sentence; while with the tag “okay” in the “Let’s” statement, we seem to be asking for agreement in the sentence. 

elisaenglish 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

A tag question is a statement turned into a question, when asking for confirmation or disconfirmation of that statement. They can be an indicator of politeness, emphasis, or irony. They may suggest confidence or lack of confidence; they may be confrontational or tentative.  For more details, please see http://elisaenglish.pixnet.net/blog/post/639570

 

Here are some exercises.  Move the mouse next the answers to reveal the answers.  The trick is to find out the focus of the sentence.  What is the asker trying to confirm or validate?  Is it a sarcastic statement or a confrontational statement?  Is it a suggestion, an invitation or an order?

elisaenglish 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

Past Continuous / Past Progressive vs. Past Perfect Continuous / Past Perfect Progressive (過去進行式 vs. 過去完成進行式)

 

Elisa文章版權所有 - 請勿竊取.

 

elisaenglish 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

Present Perfect vs. Present Perfect Continuous / Present Perfect Progressive (現在完成式 vs. 現在完成進行)

 

Elisa English 文章版權所有 - 請勿竊取. 

elisaenglish 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

Past Perfect (過去完成式)

  

Elisa文章版權所有 - 請勿竊取. 

elisaenglish 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

Past Perfect vs. Past Perfect Continuous / Past Perfect Progressive (過去完成式 vs. 過去完成進行式)

 

1.  Past Perfect Continuous states actions or events that are still in progress up to a point in time in the past, while Past Perfect states actions or events that are completed.  The emphasis is on the result when using the past perfect tense; while, the emphasis is on the activity when using the past perfect continuous.

elisaenglish 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

Past Perfect Continuous / Past Perfect Progressive (過去完成進行式)

 

Elisa文章版權所有 - 請勿竊取. 

elisaenglish 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

Present Perfect Continuous / Present Perfect Progressive (現在完成進行式)

 

Elisa文章版權所有 - 請勿竊取.

elisaenglish 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

Past Simple vs. Past Continuous / Past Progressive (過去式 vs. 過去進行式)

 

Elisa文章版權所有 - 請勿竊取.

elisaenglish 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

Past Continuous / Past Progressive (過去進行式)

 

Elisa文章版權所有 - 請勿竊取.

elisaenglish 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

Present Perfect vs. Past Simple (現在完成式 vs. 過去式)

 

The main distinction between present perfect and past simple is that one (past simple) states something that happened at a specific point of time in the past and ended in the distant past such as at last December, and the other (present perfect) states something that happened at an unspecific point of time in the past which continues to the present and has not finished yet (specifying duration from the past until now) or may have finished in the recent past with an impact to the present. 

elisaenglish 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

The Simple Past Tense (簡單過去式)

 

1.  Events and actions happened in the past.  A specific point in time in the past (a year ago). 

elisaenglish 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

Present Simple vs. Present Continuous / Present Progressive (現在式 vs. 現在進行式)

 

The main distinction between present simple and present continuous is that one (present simple) states a more permanent situation such as facts or repetitive actions, and the other (present continuous) states a more temporary condition such as things happening at this very moment.  When talking about states or feelings, use simple present tense unless you are stressing the feeling at this very moment as we speak. 

elisaenglish 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

“Would rather” or “had rather” indicates preference, similar to “wish”, used in unreal situation.

 

1.  To indicate an unreal present:

elisaenglish 發表在 痞客邦 PIXNET 留言(0) 人氣()

1 2345